IELTS writing Task 2 : The Olympics
IELTS writing Task 2 question: The Olympics
Here is an example of a task 2 question on the topic of the Olympics:
Some people believe that hosting the Olympic Games brings significant benefits to the host country, while others think it is a waste of money that could be better spent on other public services. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Think about how you would answer this question.
Below is an example structure. Try and write an IELTS task 2 answer based on the prompts below. They will help you with ideas and structure.
When you have finished look at the answers for an example of an IELTS 7 answer.
Sample Answer Structure
Introduction:
- Introduce the topic of hosting the Olympics and present the two opposing views.
- State your own opinion clearly.
Body Paragraph 1 (Supporting Benefits):
- Discuss the economic benefits, such as increased tourism and job creation.
- Mention the long-term infrastructure improvements that can result from hosting the Games.
Body Paragraph 2 (Criticism of Costs):
- Highlight the high costs associated with hosting the Olympics, including construction and security expenses.
- Argue that funds could be redirected to essential services like healthcare or education.
Conclusion:
- Summarize both perspectives and restate your opinion, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the financial implications of hosting such events.
This structure allows for a balanced discussion of the topic, showcasing both sides before concluding with a personal viewpoint.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Here’s a sample IELTS Writing Task 2 answer at approximately IELTS band 7 level:
The Olympic Games, a global sporting event, has long been a subject of debate regarding its impact on host countries. While some argue that hosting the Olympics brings substantial benefits, others contend that it is an unnecessary financial burden. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own view on the matter.
Proponents of hosting the Olympics often highlight the significant economic advantages it can bring to a country. The influx of tourists during the Games can boost local businesses and create job opportunities in various sectors such as hospitality and construction. Moreover, the development of infrastructure required for the event, including new stadiums and improved transportation systems, can have long-lasting benefits for the host city’s residents. For instance, the 2012 London Olympics led to the regeneration of East London, transforming a previously neglected area into a thriving community.
On the other hand, critics argue that the enormous costs associated with hosting the Olympics outweigh any potential benefits. The construction of state-of-the-art facilities and implementation of stringent security measures often result in massive overspending, leaving the host country with substantial debt. Furthermore, these purpose-built venues frequently become “white elephants” after the Games, requiring ongoing maintenance without generating sufficient revenue. Critics contend that such funds could be better allocated to improving essential public services like healthcare and education, which would have a more direct and lasting impact on citizens’ lives.
In my opinion, while hosting the Olympics can bring prestige and some economic benefits to a country, the financial risks and potential for long-term debt are too significant to ignore. I believe that countries, especially those with developing economies, should carefully consider their priorities and financial capabilities before bidding to host such large-scale events. Instead, investing in sustainable development projects and essential services would likely yield more tangible and widespread benefits for the population.
In conclusion, although the Olympic Games can offer some advantages to host countries, the substantial costs and potential for economic strain make it a risky endeavor. Governments should weigh the pros and cons carefully, prioritizing the long-term well-being of their citizens over the temporary prestige of hosting a global sporting event.
(Word count: 345)
